Latest Post
8:05 AM
Final Declaration 9th Asia-Europe People’s Forum - Vientiane, Laos
Written By Freedam to the nation resettlement of IDPs on Tuesday, October 23, 2012 | 8:05 AM
Final Declaration 9th Asia-Europe People’s Forum -
Vientiane, Laos
We, over 1,000 women and men,
representing people’s organizations and citizens from Asia and Europe joined
together from 16th to 19th October 2012 in Vientiane, Laos at the 9th Asia
Europe People’s Forum under the title“People’s Solidarity
against Poverty and for Sustainable Development: Challenging Unjust and Unequal
Development, Building States of Citizens for Citizens”. The AEPF9
tackled four major themes, or People’s Visions, which represent AEPF’s hopes
for citizens of the ASEM member countries and the communities they live
in. These are:
·
Universal Social Protection and Access
to Essential Services;
·
Food Sovereignty and Sustainable Land
and Natural Resource Management
·
Sustainable Energy Production and Use;
and
·
Just Work and Sustainable Livelihoods.
Preceding
the 9th Asia-Europe People’s Forum we held three preparatory workshops in South
and South-East Asia on our four themes. In Laos, 16 provincial level
consultations were held which contributed to the development of a draft Lao
People’s Vision Statement. These brought together the reflections, aspirations and
visions of the Lao people from a wide range of mass and civil society
organisations across Lao society. They are an important contribution to
future dialogues for development and seen as part of the Laos’ commitment to
strengthening partnerships for development.
At
the Asia Europe People’s Forum 9 we focussed on developing strategies and
recommendations to our elected representatives in our countries, and to
ourselves, as active citizens.
We
met at a time of major historical importance that has brought into sharp focus
the drastic inequalities, injustices and poverty experienced by people across
Asia and Europe. What is often presented as a ‘financial crisis’ is in
reality part of a series of interlinked crises - food, energy, climate, human
security and environmental degradation - that are already devastating the
lives, and compounding the poverty and exclusion faced on a daily basis by
millions of women, men and children across Asia and increasingly across
Europe. The gap between the rich and the poor is widening, and access to
resources, livelihood opportunities and basic services remain grossly
unequal. The ASEM9 is an historic opportunity for ASEM governments to
take the timely and decisive actions needed to address this.
There
is a strong consensus among Asian and European citizens gathered at the AEPF9
that the dominant approach over the last decades - based around deregulation of
markets, increasing power of multinational corporations, unaccountable
multilateral institutions and trade liberalisation - has failed in its aims to
meet the needs and rights of all citizens. We need to go beyond an
analysis and response that focuses solely on short-term measures benefiting a
few financial institutions and large corporations. There is a deep felt
need and demand for change and for new people-centred policies and practices.
Despite
the policy failures of trade liberalisation, market deregulation and
privatisation, our governments continue to ignore the growing tangible
consensus for fundamental policy change. Instead of fulfilling the needs
of people and reinvigorating local economies, hundreds of billions of Euros
have been mobilised to save the banks and financial system, while essential
social services remain under-funded and are being dismantled in many parts of
Europe.
Despite
existing laws, regulations, standards and mechanisms, our governments have
failed to prioritise human rights, environmental security and labour rights,
over the profits of companies. The consequences of this corporate
domination are experienced in the lives of millions of women, men and children
across Asia and Europe. This has led to a hollowing out of democratic
accountability as elites make decisions and implement policies with little or
no scrutiny from citizens, creating the conditions for poverty, inequality,
environmental devastation and growing social unrest.
Our
governments and the citizens of Asia and Europe have the responsibility to
transform our social, economic and political futures so that we can all live in
peace, security and dignity. We all need to take responsibility to work
together to create and implement the radical and creative solutions needed for
people-centred recovery and change.
We
therefore call upon the governments who are members of ASEM to implement people-centred
responses to the current crises in an effective and responsible manner.
Urgent need must be given to poor, excluded and marginalised people and
governments must work with citizens to develop and implement policies that will
lead to a just, equal and sustainable world, and more accountable and
democratic institutions – based on respect for gender equality, our environment
and our fundamental human rights.
The
AEPF is a strategic civil society gathering of Asian and European social
movements fighting poverty and inequality and working for social justice.
The AEPF is grounded in the common desires of people’s organisations and social
justice networks across Asia and Europe to open up new venues for dialogue,
solidarity and action.
The
following call to action is based on the recommendations from the many vibrant
and exciting events that were held throughout these four days.
Call to Action - from
the 9th Asia Europe People’s Forum
The
9th Asia Europe People’s Forum, representing citizens, people and social
movements from Asia and Europe, urges ASEM and its member Governments to
recognise the following issues, priorities and to take forward our
recommendations:
1. Universal
Social Protection and Access to Essential Services
Globally,
only 20 percent of people have access to social protection- the coverage in
nearly all Asian countries is even lower. In Europe, the welfare state and
social contract have been systematically eroded by both national governments
and European Union (EU) institutions in the name of market-driven policies and
private profits.
Social
protection and access to essential services are fundamental rights covering
rights to work, adequate food, essential services and social security.
States have the obligation to actively promote, protect and fulfil these
rights. After 2015, following on from Millennium Development Goals, there
is a new opportunity for governments to legislate for a comprehensive set of
transformative social 'indispensable to a life' policies to promote universal
social protection based on human and social rights.
A
transformative social protection system is a broad package of commitments and
services that includes social security, social assistance, labour rights and
social services that covers the entire population in order to prevent and
reduce poverty. It should protect individuals against risks of
impoverishment in situations of sickness, disability, unemployment, old age,
high healthcare costs, general poverty and social exclusion. It
subscribes to principles of equality and non-discrimination, fosters organic
solidarity, and contributes to human security and to the common good of
humanity.
A
transformative and universal social protection system must be implemented
together with alternative national development strategies that restore the
sovereign rights of states to chart a people-centred development that is just,
democratic, and sustainable, reversing the neo-liberal policies of liberalisation,
deregulation, and privatization.
Key Recommendations
We
call on our governments to:
1. Enact legislation and
secure public finance for a social protection system that is rights-based and
universal. This will enable basic social protection for all people
including workers - informal and formal, paid and unpaid, women and men,
including migrants. This social protection system covers fundamental
rights vital to a life of dignity which include: The Right to Work (access to
work guarantees, living wages and decent work according to ILO core standards,
full employment with shorter working weeks), Food, Essential Services (access
to universal and quality health and reproductive health care, education, water
and sanitation, energy and affordable and decent public housing), Social
Security (living pensions for the elderly and disabled, child subsidies), and
insurance with guaranteed fair/living wage (against risks of unemployment,
illness and agricultural calamities).
2. Develop adequate
fiscal policies that generate sufficient domestic funds for universal social
protection. Appropriate tax regimes should effectively tax transnational
corporations, rich individuals and large landowners rather than applying
regressive taxation such as VAT. Our governments should introduce a
Financial Transaction Tax, close tax havens and secret banking and cancel
odious debts.
3. Work through ASEAN to
adopt a Social Agenda that will include the universalisation of social
protection and the decommodification of all essential goods and services
indispensable to life. Social protection should be under state authority and
free for all people.
4. Be parties to
developing and agreeing a UN Charter on the Common Goods of Humankind that will
establish the common ownership of resources, goods and services, which are
essential to life; cooperative management by the international community must
be adopted.
5. Exclude TRIPS plus
provisions in all bilateral/multilateral trade agreements especially provisions
on data exclusivity and patent extension because of its direct impacts on
public health and access to medicines. TRIPS plus provisions threaten and
undermine governments’ authority to use the TRIPS flexibilities allowed them in
favour of providing for affordable and accessible medicines for the majority.
These flexibilities are even more important given the reality that
out-of-pocket costs of medicines are increasing, with the poor in Asia often
spending more than half of their income on medicines.
6. Ratify and fully
implement the UN Conventions on the Rights of Disabled People and mainstream
disability concerns into local and national economic and social development; a
focus should be placed on empowering people with disabilities and their
organisations to ensure equal participation and full inclusion in all respects
of life.
7. Recognise the complex
root causes of poverty and to ensure that all countries ensure that all
citizens have the opportunity to have their voices heard, opinions respected
and can participate in decision making that affects them, as well as in
defining what it is those decisions need to be. This must include
children and young people and it must go further than basic adherence to
international legal instruments such as the Convention on Rights of the
Child. It is critical that mechanisms are developed and implemented to
provide opportunities for true participation at the local, national and global
level to ensure that development is inclusive of all, including children, young
people and the most vulnerable. These voices must be heard to ensure a
move towards more just and people-centred services and development.
8. Ensure and guarantee
quality, basic education for all and fast track affirmative actions for
marginalized children, youth and adults.
9. Promote and support
literacy and respect for local wisdom as the foundation for life-long learning.
Finance fully-costed life long learning program that enable everyone
regardless of age, sex and ethnicity to access opportunities throughout life
through formal, non-formal and informal education.
10. Ensure quality
curricula in formal, non-formal and informal education that integrates
participatory sustainable development, technical-vocational life, skills,
self-determination and participation within the framework of Education for
Sustainable Development (ESD). Learners should have a say on what quality
learning means.
11. Enhance positive
cooperation between Civil Society Organizations, Governments and the private
sector toward sustainable development.
12. Support all citizens
to take part in drafting and review of national development frameworks.
13. Develop and promote
adequate social protection mechanisms for indigenous peoples and ensure their
access to essential services.
14. Ensure a shift from
corporate social responsibility to corporate social accountability that
emphasizes diligence with its elements of prevention, protection, prosecution
and reparation according to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of
Discrimination Against Women (CEDAW) for human rights violations, including
gender-based impacts and violence.
15. Strengthen and
implement safeguards policies and accountability mechanisms, including the
dissemination of correct and complete information, free and prior informed
consent, organization of meaningful community consultations, administer just
compensation and actions that ensure the bodily integrity and social well-being
of communities, especially marginalized groups such as women and minorities, to
hold governments, corporations and international financial institutions
accountable and ensure a development towards resilient, equitable, inclusive
low carbon communities.
16. Migrants must have the
right to marriage, family, culture and political participation. This includes
raising children according to their identity and culture. These rights ensure
full participation in community life. One must also be able to keep one’s
identity, unlike many migration policies, which promote assimilation.
17. The Hague Convention
on child custody must be recognized by all countries.
2. Food
Sovereignty and Sustainable Land and Natural Resource Management
In
response to the financial, economic, and ecological crises, a new wave of land,
water and resource grabbing is occurring. Powerful international and
domestic forces are pushing forward a new round of enclosures globally for both
food and non-food purposes.
In
Asia, land and resource grabbing is accelerating in the name of
‘development’. There is a growing body of evidence that these large-scale
investments in agriculture and extractive industries are resulting in a cascade
of negative impacts on rural livelihoods and ecologic, human rights, and local
food security and food sovereignty.
In
Europe, the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP), based on the international
competitiveness of European agri-business, is forcing many farmers to exit
agriculture. The EU’s bio-energy policies, most prominently the Renewable
Energy Directive (RED), are diverting land used for food production for
large-scale, monoculture, agro-fuel and agro-energy crop production. The
EU’s trade policy, in particular the Everything But Arms initiative, has fueled global land grabbing.
Banks,
hedge funds and pension funds are betting on food prices in financial markets,
causing drastic price swings in staple foods such as wheat, maize and
soya. This speculation on food is driving up global food prices. Food
speculation by banks and financial market traders must be regulated.
We are facing a global water
crisis. Never has there been such pressure on water resources and such
water scarcity. In many countries, the water crisis is manipulated by
International Finance Institutions’ (World Bank and Asian Development Bank)
drive to grab water and has resulted in the takeover of water resources and
services by corporations and private companies. This situation encourages
anti-poor policies, increasing the role for corporations in the water sector,
and producing bigger pubic debts, which in the end do not necessarily ensure
water provision, equitable access and efficiency[DG1] .
Within
the social movements, food sovereignty has prevailed as an alternative to the
industrial agricultural model. Food sovereignty is based on the right of
peoples to define their own food, agriculture, livestock and fishery systems,
independent of international market forces. It is called for by farmers,
peasants, pastoralists, fisher folk, indigenous peoples, women, rural youth and
their allies all over the world.
Our
common vision is therefore based on the principles of food and land
sovereignty. Peasants, small-scale food producers, and rural populations should
be able to decide their own development path.
Our
health and the health of the earth and future generations depend on healthy
soil, strong food communities and small-scale diversified farms. There are
growing movements of young farmers and alternatives agriculture, which can
provide solutions to many of the global challenges we are facing. To support
these, we should promote local food systems and strengthen networks for farming
with dignity, integrity and self-reliance.
Key Recommendations
We
call on our governments to:
1. Oppose land and
resource grabbing and support the Human Right to Food. Implement the
Voluntary Guidelines on Responsible Governance of Tenure of Land, Fisheries,
and Forests. These Guidelines are an important first step in protecting
the tenure rights of small-scale food producers and ensuring a more equitable
governance of natural resources.
2. Support the on-going
process at the UN level of the recognition of the Rights of Peasants.
3. Respect human rights
in its trade, agricultural, energy, development, environmental, land and water
policies. The EU should investigate the impact of its trade policies,
such as the Everything But Arms agreement, which has evicted thousands of people
from their land in some countries.
4. Drop the agro-fuels
targets under the Renewable Energy Directive.
5. Support food
sovereignty in Asia and Europe, including in the reform process of the EU’s
Common Agricultural Policy.
6. Invest in a coherent,
progressive, publicly funded rural development strategy. This
investment should focus on the needs of small-scale food producers, rural
women, and indigenous peoples. Local and national development plans must fully recognize the rights of local communities to sustainable livelihoods and food
sovereignty. They should protect and respect people’s access to land,
water and biodiversity. The Development Agenda must recognize that women
traditionally have skills and knowledge for livelihoods that ensure food
security for all.
7. Respect the rights of
indigenous peoples to their lands, territories and resources as the material,
economic, social and cultural base for their collective survival and
development. This includes the full and effective participation of
indigenous peoples in decision-making processes relating to development
including the requirement for free, prior and informed consent of indigenous
peoples in development projects. Lastly, acknowledge the contribution of
indigenous peoples in sustainable development through their simple and low
carbon lifestyles, their traditional knowledge, indigenous techniques and
innovative ways of production.
8. Regulate food
speculation by banks and financial market traders as a matter of urgency. By
passing legislation to ensure that all futures contracts are cleared through
regulated exchanges. Contracts need to be brought out into the open, in the
same way that shares are traded on the stock exchange. There should also
be strict limits on the amount that bankers can bet on food prices. Caps should
be set on the amount of the market that can be held by the biggest traders, and
on the amount of the market that can be held by financial speculators as a
whole
3. Sustainable
Energy Production and Use
The current development paradigm, characterized
by overproduction and consumption without regard to the earth’s capacity, is
incompatible with long-term solutions needed to save the economy and our
planet. Governments should see the climate crisis as an opportunity to
embark to a low carbon society and enable inclusive development by
promoting renewable energy access and availability to the most disadvantaged
and remote communities. To understand the cause of climate change and
come up with sustainable solutions to the problems linked with the degradation
of natural resources and increasing environmental insecurity and injustice, we
need to see the connection between the climate crisis and the way societies are organized.
Access
to energy is a fundamental right and not a privilege. People must have a
say in energy governance. Justice and social transformation should be the
measures for even energy distribution between countries and within
societies. Many cases of hydropower dams still show the lack of consensus
in viewing the causes of problems and the appropriate solutions needed to
address energy poverty.
Market
based instruments are emerging as a new development approach which brings
environmental resources – the commons – into the current market system under
the Green Economy. Payments for environmental services and offsetting are two
main ideas behind the approach. However, they would undermine the shift
to genuinely sustainable livelihoods and self-reliance of small-scale farmers
and forest communities and on the other hand delay necessary transition to a
low carbon society in industrialized nations. Other solutions proposed
under the ‘Green Economy’ include those new technologies which are unproven and
unsafe, including GMOs and synthetic biology, nano-technology, bio-fuels and
geo-engineering (amongst others) which have a tendency to mainly benefit large
corporations.
In
particular the carbon market established through international climate policy
has led to the promotion of projects, which do not deliver environmental and
social benefits, some of them even being harmful to local communities.
Moreover, international climate policy has generated a number of false
solutions which are unproven, unsafe and unsustainable, such as monoculture
plantations, GMOs, geo-engineering and massive biofuel exports / imports
jeopardizing food security.
The
UN has adopted the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIPS)
rather than insisting that the UN Collaborative Program on Reducing Emissions
from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) complies to UNDRIPs.
There are remaining unresolved issues, which pose questions on the need for
REDD. REDD projects also show a tendency towards militarization in the
implementation of projects. It is proving to become another way to
pollute and negatively exploit forest resources. Indigenous peoples often
do not want REDD, they want their rights to live in and manage forests to be
upheld; REDD also fails to address climate change.
Lastly,
waste generation is a result of negative resource use and waste production from
individual and business activities, as well as inadequate governmental
policies. Anything that cannot be re-used, recycled, or re-designed is
pollution – a threat to human and planetary existence and a negative legacy to
future generations. Thus it must be eliminated, prevented from being
produced or banned from entering the market.
Key Recommendations
We
call on our governments to:
1. To fulfil their
responsibility to mitigate climate change, pay its ecological debt to poor
countries and realise fair sharing of development space, the EU should achieve
a major transition to a sustainable energy system, based on renewable energies,
energy efficiency and also sufficiency, and therefore speed up and intensify
their efforts.
2. Shift the system of
production and consumption oriented on continuous expansion and appropriation
of nature to a more sustainable and environment-friendly one, which fulfils the
needs of people and not corporations.
3. Ensure a political
environment where people can confidently participate and discuss their ideas
for alternative energy policies and create a participative processes of energy
development and production that reflect the concerns and needs of affected communities.
4. Develop and implement
effective, socially fair and just policies and measures to promote renewable
energy, in particular decentralised installations and systems, transformative
solutions to end energy poverty, as well as improved energy efficiency (in both
developing and developed countries).
5. Commit to progressing,
with urgency, to a nuclear power free world. This will require
decommissioning existing nuclear power stations, stopping the development of
planned power stations and taking forward alternatives.
6. Take forward ambitious
and serious thinking of how to enable and empower small and very small power
producers and to develop policies that will realize up-scaling community based
energy systems.
7. Uphold a human rights
approach to the governance of natural commons, especially in terms of
allocation, distribution and resource management. Uphold the UN
Resolution that states water is a human right and not private property, not a
commodity, not a trad able economic good and not simply a factor of production.
Water should not be transformed from a commons to a commodity.
8. Legislate and
implement a national waste plan that will reduce waste, phase out
non-biodegradable plastics, build infrastructures and mechanisms to reduce,
re-use, re-cycle and redesign waste. Companies and other actors that do
not comply with effective and sustainable waste management policies must be
held liable or sanctioned.
9. Recognize the right of
people and communities in forest areas and their capacity to sustainably use
and manage forest resources in preference to global forest-carbon schemes and
mechanisms before any development or conservation scheme is considered.
4. Just Work and
Sustainable Livelihoods
Dramatic
changes in the context of work and in the forms of labour and employment are
happening across Asia and Europe. Despite the differences – in particular
the debt crisis in Europe and the livelihood crisis in Asia caused by
investments increasingly based on land and water grabbing - many common
features can be identified. Migration in and between countries, with a
risk of trafficking, is increasing in Asia as well as in Europe. The
hopes for job and income security and sustainable livelihoods have not materialized. Where labour has been formalised, labour standards and workers’
rights are being eroded and Trade Unions and collective bargaining are being
weakened. The power and profits of corporations are increasing.
Free Trade Agreements are leading to further erosion of workers rights’ and
the dismantling of social protection. Where growth occurs it is often
jobless growth.
The
precarious and unprotected forms of labour which are dominant in Asia,
informal, casual, contract, and temporary employment have come to Europe.
For the sake of competitiveness and in the interest of investors, the
imperative of reducing labour costs is consolidating the trend towards
low-waged and insecure employment. The race to the bottom is speeding
up. Cutting costs in the public sector of many countries is leading to
decreases in jobs and in essential social services. In Europe, the crisis
is causing more unemployment, more precarious and vulnerable work, as well as
cuts in wages and pensions. Even in countries less hit by the crisis, the
feeling of the majority of the population is a growing insecurity in and of
work and about social protection. At the same time, social inequalities
and disparities in wages, income and well-being are growing with a mounting
number of working poor and millionaires/’super-rich’.
This
overall restructuring of labour and labour markets in different contexts makes
it impossible to still draw clear lines between formal and informal, secure and
insecure, paid and unpaid work. A concept of justice in work has to go
beyond rules and regulations for waged labour and include all work outside of
the market, balance the inequalities between women and men, care work and
industrial work, and protect local communities and migrants' rights. It
is necessary to think much more outside of the box, search for new forms of
organisation and for different economic paths which head towards an economy of
solidarity, and socially, gender and environmentally just and sustainable
livelihoods.
A
few Transnational Corporations (TNCs) control 40 per cent of the global
economy. Bilateral investment treaties and investment chapters in the
Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) are part of an architecture of impunity for
transnational corporations (TNCs) and as such undermine the sovereignty of both
developed and developing countries, democratic governance and peoples’
interests. They allow corporations to challenge national laws that go
against TNCs interests. TNCs have overturned laws and national policies
including regulations to protect public services, the environment, working
conditions, labour standards and health.
Tourism
is a huge industry and a key driver of globalization. With the growth of
tourism, the social, economic, political and cultural rights of local
communities are often neglected and violated, particularly those of poor and
vulnerable communities. They see their land and resources being
appropriated by the tourism industry, while they often do not have any say in
the development affecting their lives.
We recognize that Trade Unions, community organizations, social movements and NGOs
can join together to develop new alliances, which can join different issues and
link across sectors and between countries. Social movements and workers’ organizations have to work with governments to develop a people centres ASEAN
social charter that can enable just work, sustainable livelihoods and universal
social protection.
Key Recommendations
We
call on our governments to:
1. Ratify, if not yet
ratifies, the ILO Conventions on Domestic Workers, on Migrant Workers, on the
right to organize, and right to collective bargaining , the Core Labour
Standards (CLS), and ensure that appropriate and consistent national
legislation is passed and becomes a reality.
2. Recognize that all
workers, irrespective of their nationality or legal status, shall have the
right to labour rights, including a right to form and/or join trade unions and
collective bargaining, consistent with the international Core Labour Standards.
3. Fully implement their
commitments made at the Potsdam ASEM Labour Ministerial (September 2006)
including ILO Core Labour Standards, especially in the context of continuing
erosion of formal labour rights, collective bargaining and Trade Union rights
in some countries.
4. Implement more
redistributive policies, including minimum wages, and a progressive tax regime
which implies an income ceiling and can decrease inequality in the context of
growing inequalities in wages, income and social security in all Asian and
European countries.
5. Address the imbalance
between production and social reproduction. Policies for gender equality
have to cover both the labour market and the unpaid care economy. We call
on European governments to reaffirm their commitments to affordable and
accessible public services. We condemn the on-going privatization of
social services and call for a reversal. Paid and unpaid care and social
reproductive work should be recognized as productive and valuable work.
6. Put the interests of
people before corporate profit and greed. We demand the immediate halt of
negotiations for new investment agreements (BITs and FTAs), and the termination
of existing ones. We recommend governments that do not have the chance to
terminate the agreements, at the very least, to re-negotiate them and exclude
investor-state dispute settlement mechanism. We demand governments to end
corporate impunity and impose binding obligations on corporations that
prioritize human, economic, environmental, labour and social rights.
7. Work with social
movements and workers’ organisations to develop a people-centred ASEAN social
charter that can enable just work, sustainable livelihoods and universal social
protection.
8. To recognise there are
human rights abuses related to tourism, commercial, trade and industrial
activities, to strengthen solidarity with affected communities and to build
alliances to advocate for change. Governments must ensure that human
rights are respected and that people can participate in decision-making
processes affecting their lives. No development must lead to evictions or
displacement of people from their land, natural resources and livelihoods,
violating their human rights. Governments must enforce adequate
regulations to protect their population against all kinds of human rights
violations.
9. Ratify the UN
Convention on the Protection of Rights and Well Being of Migrant Workers and
members of their families and other relevant conventions as a minimum
requirement for protecting the rights, decent work and well being of migrant
workers. Recognize and protect the rights of migrant domestic workers and
provide for the protection of their labour and human rights – in consultation
with civil society and trade unions.
10. Standardize the human
rights of migrant workers in regional bodies in a way that adheres to and adds
value to international human rights standards such as Convention on the Rights
of Migrant Workers and their Families, International Labour Organization, and
Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.
This includes a standardization of procedures and process for labour migration
to prevent discrimination based on gender, health, civil status and
nationality.
11. Articulate progressive
policies on sexual and reproductive health and rights of migrants and migrant
workers, especially women, ensuring individual self-determination of body,
sexuality and mobility in the whole process of migration.
12. Ensure the right of
marriage migrants to marriage, citizenship, family, culture and political
participation. This includes raising children according one’s identity and
culture, instead of being imposed an assimilation policy.
13. Recognize, respect and
protect diaspora communities by establishing and institutionalizing policies
and programs , (with regular and adequate budgets), including complaint
mechanisms and inter-country cooperation, and gender-sensitive services that
can protect migrants including marriage migrants from abuse and exploitation.
14. End the criminalization of migrants and refugees. Implement human rights in dealing
with: children, asylum seekers, pregnant women, the elderly, people with
disabilities, people with special medical needs, or victims of
trafficking. Authorities of migrants’ countries of origin shall provide
consular assistance and other appropriate support when it is requested by its
nationals. Authorities of the countries of origin shall pressure
detaining countries to treat detained migrants humanely and lawfully
15. To set up an Asia
Europe Tripartite Mechanism for the preparation and development of the Asia
Europe Instrument on Migrant Workers as well as other labour related
instruments and policies.
16. Abolish short-term or
fixed duration employment contracts, and if still needed in exceptional
situation should be limited in their use.
17. Abolish
manpower/labour outsourcing and all forms of triangular employment
arrangements.
18. Recognize that human
rights defenders, including CSR/TNC compliance monitoring bodies, should issue
alerts, lobby companies and governments, raise awareness among the general
population and support workers who want to advocate for their rights.
19. Recognize that trade
unions and CSR/TNC monitoring bodies should be encouraged to lobby governments
to ensure that trade agreements include guarantees for labour conditions and
rights of workers. Ensure mechanisms which are mandatory, accountable and
transparent, which can complement existing law or enhance them. Develop a
collaborative mechanism between all sectors and actors.
20. When government and/or
ASEAM have discussions and engagements with investors, trade unions must always
be part of the process.
The AEPF9’s participants also noted that
the peace, security and people’s
solidarity are
the preconditions for Poverty Reduction and Sustainable
Development.
Key Recommendations
We
call on our governments to:
1. Develop long term
solutions to promote peace, human security and sustainable development by
addressing the root causes of violent conflicts e.g. non-respect of minorities
that prioritise non-violent means of conflict resolution, people-to-people
interactions, use of international laws and regional co-operation.
2. Recognise and address
security threats both multilaterally and multi-dimensionally through the United
Nations, and adhere to principles of international law.
3. Establish an
inter-regional conflict resolution mechanism to develop common visions on
foreign policy and security, based on respect for national sovereignty and
human rights.
4. Fully implement UNSC
Resolution 1325 that recognises women are both disproportionately affected by
conflict and key actors in promoting peace, reconstruction and reconciliation.
5. In tackling religious
extremism, give special emphasis to the role of education and inter- and
intra-convictional/faith dialogues at all levels. Ensure full freedom of
expression and information to enable rational debate and understanding.
6. Enact national
legislation to guarantee full and public disclosure of government defence, arms
exports and security budgets.
7. Cut military
expenditure that is being funded at the expense of health and education programs.
8. Use the
Non-Proliferation Treaty as the basis of regional co-operation and take steps
to denuclearize Europe and Asia while striving for a nuclear free world.
9. Take primary
responsibility to control the trade and proliferation of arms. Develop and agree
transparent and binding mechanisms, overseen by the UN, to control arms imports
and exports.
10. Support of the
implementation Cluster Munitions Convention. Support the clearance Unexploded
Ordinance (UXO) and the rehabilitation of affected women, men, children and
communities.
11. Introduce legislation
to make the European Code of Conduct on Arms Exports legally binding (with
respect to European Union member states) and take steps to negotiate a Code of
Conduct (with respect to states in Asia).
12. Support and protect
survivors of the use and effects of weapons of mass destruction. Hold companies
responsible for the production of weapons of mass destruction and toxic
chemicals to account so that victims are compensated.
13. Develop and support
mechanisms for trauma healing and social reconciliation as part of
post-conflict reconstruction.