The
Year End Evaluation and Planning Meeting
National
Fisheries Solidarity Movement implements some programs such as a program
related to the IDP issues, budget monitoring
program that is related to good governances, Why hunger program that
especially related to women headed families because of the war , disappearance
and other reasons and also a program based on Indu- Sri Lanka cross board
issues.
Those
projects are implemented as the main
programs of National Fisheries Solidarity Movement especially in the North and
East . We have been intervening many ways to develop the community being
conducted different programs within last year as a civil organization in the North and East, Sri Lanka. So, we
planed two days workshop to evaluate the progress had within the project year.
We had five objectives such as asses the impacts of the programs, prepare a
basic action plan for next year, identify the challengers, shearing experience
among the partners and consider the access to media, networks and other campaign.
.
We used different methods to assess the achievements on programs as two sectors. The year end evaluation and planning meeting
was held on the common programs which are being implemented by National
Fisheries Solidarity Movement in the North and east on 13/14 December 2012 in
the NAFSO secretariat office, Negombo. We
met the district coordinators and volunteers who are the responsible staff in
field level in first two days of the workshop. Common discussions, group work, presentations,
games and some practical activities were used to be come out the
achievements. Every group has done desk
work as prior preparation before coming to the meeting in district level. We considered some areas on the progress such
as membership development, leadership building, conducting meeting, reporting,
empowerment of women headed families, usage of the media and common and
internal campaigns and also trainings they got.
District coordinators and volunteers who came
form Jaffna, Manna, Batticaloa, Ampara and Tricomalee districts participated to
the evaluation meeting. We were able to come out the achievements on different
programs in district level. District coordinators and volunteers engaged
actively to success the program. They used different ways to present the
progress they got through the activities. We considered the changers they were
able to do in the community as impact because of implementing the different
activities within project year. Some mistakes and also challenges could be
identified of the programs. Basic proposals were taken form the district
coordinators and volunteers to prepare the action plan for next year.
Facilitation of the program
*Herman Kumara
*Priyankarara costa
*Predeep Wanigasuriya
*A.Jesudasan
*Lavina Hasanthi
Post a Comment